Left Melts Down Over Trump Student Loan Rule — But Facts Tell Different Story

By
Right Patriots
-
0

A Trump administration rule change on student loans sparked a viral meltdown on social media this week — but the actual policy bears almost no resemblance to what the left claims it does.

The firestorm began when the left-wing New Republic posted an article Sunday claiming “Trump is banning students majoring in degrees that don’t make enough money from taking out college loans.”

“DEGREES FOR SOCIAL WORK, ART, RELIGIOUS STUDIES, TEACHING AIDES, AND MUSIC WILL BE HIT THE HARDEST.”

The post went viral instantly, racking up more than 20 million views and igniting panic across the platform.

“This is actually f***ing evil holy s***,” one post with more than 3 million views said. “In the land of the free, students must only study what the president approves apparently.”

Transgender journalist Katelyn Burns claimed the policy was “about discouraging women from going to college.” Another confused user asked: “Doesn’t this violate the First Amendment?”

Democratic members of Congress and governors joined the pile-on, releasing panicked statements condemning the change.

There’s just one problem: almost none of them understand what the policy actually does.

The rule — already in the works since the One Big Beautiful Bill Act was signed in July 2025 — restricts federal student loan eligibility for degree programs that leave graduates earning no more than someone with just a high school diploma.

American Enterprise Institute scholar Preston Cooper broke down the reality:

“The bar is median earnings of high school graduates. This rule is very sensibly saying college grads should be at least better off than people who never went to college at all. It’s a crazy low bar.”

“FEWER THAN 5% OF UNDERGRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS COULD LOSE ELIGIBILITY UNDER THE NEW RULE.”

Cooper pointed out that the programs most likely to lose eligibility aren’t philosophy or art history — they’re for-profit beauty schools and cosmetology certificate programs.

And even those programs aren’t getting “banned.” Students can still attend them — they’ll just need to pay out of pocket or secure private loans instead of federal taxpayer-backed funding.

The policy applies program-by-program at each individual college or university — not blanket bans on entire majors. The vast majority of English, social work, philosophy, and even gender studies degree programs at different universities will remain eligible for student loans because their average graduates still earn enough to qualify.

Only specific programs at specific institutions that fail the “do no harm” earnings test will lose eligibility.

So the entire hysterical meltdown is rooted in a fundamental misunderstanding of the policy. The rule doesn’t make any majors ineligible across the board. It doesn’t “ban” degrees. It doesn’t violate the First Amendment.

It simply says taxpayers won’t subsidize degree programs that leave graduates no better off than high school grads.

That’s not “evil” or “authoritarian.” That’s common sense.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR