New Poll: 1 In 3 Democrats Support Televised Ending of Trump

0

Around one in three Democrats would support seeing President Trump’s presidency end in a televised execution, according to a new poll from the Center for Strategic Politics that exposes the violent fantasies simmering on the left. The finding represents a dramatic escalation in partisan hostility, raising questions about the boundaries of acceptable political discourse in an already fractured America.

The survey results are worse than that.

59% of Democrats support a military coup against the Trump administration, the polling data shows. Stark majorities want top administration officials arrested and imprisoned. Nearly 70% want the Supreme Court packed. These numbers suggest that significant portions of one major political party now view extra-constitutional measures as legitimate responses to electoral outcomes they oppose—a departure from democratic norms that have governed American political life for generations.

The party that slaps “coexist” bumper stickers on Priuses apparently wants gulags, show trials, and public executions for anyone who voted red. The contradiction between professed values of tolerance and the authoritarian impulses revealed in this polling data highlights a cognitive dissonance that has become characteristic of contemporary progressive politics.

“When they say they want to see Trump die on television… it’s just a proxy for Republicans more generally. Given the opportunity, they’ll fill the gulags with Wrong Thinkers.”

Additional findings from the poll include:

  • 52% want the filibuster eliminated
  • 69% want the Supreme Court packed with additional justices
  • 68% believe America needs “more immigrants”
  • Majorities support launching ICE-related, Iran-related, and military-related investigations against Trump administration officials

Taken together, these data points reveal a broader pattern of institutional capture and transformation. The desire to eliminate procedural safeguards like the filibuster, reshape the judicial branch through court-packing, and weaponize investigative powers against political opponents represents a comprehensive vision for consolidating power rather than sharing it through democratic compromise.

The Democrat rank-and-file celebrated the anniversary of the Charlie Kirk attack — a brutal incident livestreamed to the world. That wasn’t about Kirk specifically. It was about what he represents: conservative Americans who refuse to fall in line. The celebration of political violence, once confined to fringe elements, has migrated toward the mainstream of progressive activism, suggesting a normalization of intimidation tactics as political tools.

Curtis Yarvin recently appeared on the Michael Malice podcast and laid out what a 2028 Democrat victory would look like. His forecast wasn’t optimistic. Yarvin, a controversial political theorist known for his critiques of democratic governance, has emerged as an unlikely prophet of authoritarian trends he sees developing across the political spectrum.

“Number one, they’re going to do a full January 6 assembly-line prosecution of everyone. There will be some random bullshit charge,” Yarvin said. “Everyone they can find, just massive, massive prosecutions.”

“And then you’re going to see mass migration,” he continued. “8 figures and up. Per year. Very very easy to work the system so they’re allowing 20 million third worlders in every year.”

“Of course they won’t be citizens right away, but then the Democrats are going to be doing everything possible to facilitate ballot stuffing and all of their favorite little, undiscoverable things,” Yarvin added.

His predictions, while speculative, find uncomfortable resonance in the polling data showing Democratic appetite for investigating and prosecuting political opponents alongside massive increases in immigration levels—policy preferences that would fundamentally reshape the American electorate and political landscape.

The same poll asked Democrats about their 2028 presidential preferences. The results are almost comical.

Mr. Rogers — the deceased children’s television host — polls higher than their leading candidate. The finding suggests deep dissatisfaction with the current crop of Democratic leadership, or perhaps a nostalgic longing for a gentler era of American culture that stands in stark contrast to the authoritarian impulses revealed elsewhere in the survey.

The modern Democrat Party in one sentence: We love Mr. Rogers, and we want you dead on live TV. This paradox captures the fundamental contradiction at the heart of contemporary progressivism—professed compassion paired with barely concealed contempt for political opponents.

The Center for Strategic Politics released the full poll results on social media, where the data is drawing widespread attention from conservatives. The viral spread of these findings reflects growing concern about the radicalization of mainstream Democratic voters and what it might portend for American political stability in the years ahead.