Earlier this week, reports emerged regarding the concealment of a December 2022 report. This report involves seven U.S. military service members who contracted a COVID-like illness in the fall of 2019 during the World Military Games in Wuhan, China. This revelation has sparked significant interest and concern.
In light of Jim Hoft’s recent article that “confirms Gateway Pundit was correct” about their previous findings, Mike Gary, a veteran CBRN response expert, reached out to provide his perspective. With over 15 years of direct operational experience and 27 years of military service, Gary has expressed his deep concerns, suggesting the COVID-19 outbreak may not have been a natural occurrence. Instead, he sees a potential that it could have been “an intentional bioweapon release.”
The revelation that the Secretary of Defense has now identified the 2019 World Military Games in Wuhan as a probable point of origin is a matter of national importance, according to Gary.
“From my perspective, this event represented a perfect opportunity for a covert biological operation—one that exploited the stealth and delayed impact of an aerosolized pathogen like SARS-CoV-2.”
Gary elaborated, highlighting the nature of bioweapons as being “insidious by design.” They are notoriously difficult to detect, allowing for plausible deniability, and creating widespread confusion.
“We ignored the textbook indicators of a potential bio-attack and instead dismissed legitimate inquiries, even as evidence of gain-of-function research and dual-use enhancements to the spike protein,”
he emphasized. This was further “confirmed in whistleblower Major Joseph Murphy’s DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) disclosures.”
Additionally, Gary pointed to international law expert Dr. Francis Boyle, who warned as early as January 2020 about the Wuhan Institute of Virology and its connections to the Chinese military.
“Instead of heeding these warnings,” Gary stated, “leaders across government and military circles actively suppressed questions and punished those who sought accountability.”
He shared his personal experience, stating, “I experienced this firsthand,” explaining how he was “persecuted, removed from deputy command, and labeled an extremist simply for refusing the experimental vaccine and urging transparency within the chain of command.”
Trained as a CBRN officer, Gary was prepared to detect and respond to these precise threats. He tried to raise awareness, but his efforts were stifled.
“If we had approached this event with the seriousness it deserved—evaluating both an intentional release and lab leak as our top courses of action—we might have mitigated much of the fallout,”
he argued.
“Instead, our leadership chose willful blindness, and now the truth is finally catching up,”
he remarked. “We must hold those responsible accountable and ensure this never happens again.”
