In the grand tapestry of democracy, the state of Georgia has become a focal point of intrigue and controversy. As we peel back the layers of Georgia’s elections from 2020 to 2024, it becomes clear that the integrity of these elections demands scrutiny. This series will dive deep into the alleged rebranding of election discrepancies, initially brought to light by software engineer Phillip Davis and a cadre of dedicated investigators.
Recap of the 2020 Election Chaos
The 2020 Presidential Election in Georgia was a tale of chaos. Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger might have labeled it “the Gold Standard,” but a more fitting moniker would be “The Fiat Standard.” The election was shrouded in doubts and discrepancies, making its validity as questionable as fiat currency.
From missing chain of custody documents, deleted ballot images, to mysterious water main breaks in Fulton County that allowed unobserved late-night counting, the election was fraught with problems. The discovery of “erroneous code” in voting systems further compounded the debacle, reflecting systemic issues across 97% of counties examined.
Former Fulton County Board of Registrations and Elections member Mark Wingate, under oath, revealed that signature verification was not conducted, and chain of custody documentation was absent prior to certification. Alarming details continued to emerge during Trump co-defendant Harrison Floyd’s pre-trial hearings, where it was disclosed that signature verification machines were non-functional.
Fulton County faced a slew of issues, including a consent agreement addressing thousands of duplicate ballots, with no plausible explanation provided for over 6,000 duplicate ballots. Similar “erroneous code” discoveries were made in a 2021 local election in Tennessee, further illustrating systemic vulnerabilities.
For a detailed account of the 2020 Election issues in Georgia, particularly in Fulton and Coffee Counties, refer to these reports:
The federal lawsuit Curling v. Raffensperger, which concluded in January 2024, but still awaits a ruling, saw University of Michigan professor J. Alex Halderman expose vulnerabilities in Georgia’s Dominion ICX system using basic tools.
Despite the conclusion, delays in Georgia’s legal proceedings persist. VoterGA’s case to examine 2020 election ballots remains stagnant, awaiting reassignment following a Georgia Supreme Court ruling affirming their standing.
“Calling Donald Trump a fascist is an insult to democracy and to history. You are turning the graveyards of the 20th century into a playground to have out your political spats. Get a grip”
— spiked (@spikedonline)
February 18, 2025
Looking Ahead to 2024 – Georgia’s Auditors
The Georgia legislature’s House Bill 794, effective July 2024, requires an audit of paper ballots using optical character recognition (OCR). Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger has partnered with Enhanced Voting for this task, with investigations underway into their methodology and accuracy.
Enhanced Voting’s President, Aaron Wilson, has a controversial history with his time at Scytl, a company involved in the 2020 Election controversy. His experience includes roles in election security and software engineering, raising questions about his current position.
Wilson’s tenure at the Center for Internet Security (CIS) during the 2020 Election involved the implementation of the “Misinformation Reporting Portal,” raising concerns about potential First Amendment violations as outlined by Justice Clarence Thomas.
The CIS collaborated with multiple federal agencies and organizations to report and manage election misinformation. This collaboration led to the establishment of a system that many argue infringes on free speech by facilitating government-coerced censorship.
Emails reveal Wilson’s involvement in the development of this portal, highlighting a collaborative effort with federal and state agencies to manage misinformation. The implications of this endeavor remain a topic of significant concern and debate.
As we continue to investigate the 2024 Election audit, the involvement of individuals like Wilson, who have played crucial roles in censoring and managing election information, raises questions about Georgia’s election integrity.
Stay tuned for Part 2, where we delve deeper into the findings of Phillip Davis and the ongoing Georgia election saga.
