Amidst the Democrats’ dramatic uproar over the Signal messaging non-issue, there’s a bigger game afoot. It’s not just your typical “gotcha” moment. The real story here involves something far more significant.
With the theatrical antics of Representative Eric Swalwell (D-CA-14), Senator Adam Schiff (D-CA), and Senator Mark Warner (D-VA), two strategic objectives were at play. Firstly, some Democrats believed they had finally found a way to counter President Trump’s momentum and the support he’s receiving from an increasing number of American voters. However, the more astute within their ranks recognize a larger looming issue: Autopen-Gate.
The true cause of the Democratic frenzy is their attempt to distract from the Autopen scandal, a situation that stands as a genuine Constitutional Crisis. Under the Biden administration, key executive branch figures were embroiled in a criminal RICO conspiracy to avoid the 25th Amendment, skirting the necessity of a “wet signature” from a fully competent President.
This conspiracy aimed to deceive both the American public and Congress by covering up the incompetency of the commander-in-chief. President Trump has every right to challenge any document that was signed using the Autopen by the Biden Committee.
If proven, this could potentially invalidate numerous actions taken during Biden’s term, including pardons, executive orders, and legislative enactments signed through Autopen. Reports suggest that White House Staff Secretary Neera Tanden may have operated the Autopen. Her subsequent roles at networks like CNN or MSNBC raise further suspicions.
The Oversight Project provided a thorough analysis of Autopen-Gate, emphasizing the issue’s severity. Their statement begins by underscoring the importance of the President’s personal involvement:
“The United States Constitution vests numerous powers in one man and one man alone— the President of the United States. These powers include signing or vetoing bills, signing or vetoing orders, resolutions, or certain legislative votes, nominating and commissioning Officers, and granting reprieves and pardons. In all of these instances, the President’s personal action is required, i.e., he “shall” perform some action. These mandates are exclusive to the President. Therefore, it is well established that the President cannot delegate these decisions to anyone. The President affixing his wet signature not only signifies consent, but is the legally required act.”
While past Presidents and Cabinet Secretaries have used the Autopen for routine matters, critical actions like Executive Orders and legislative enactments demand a genuine signature. Significant safeguards were previously in place, such as:
- A Date Stamp
- A Secretary of Defense Action Control Number
- A “Wet Signature” for substantive actions
Many senior officials have been embarrassed by waving unauthorized copies of documents lacking these essential elements. On numerous occasions, they faced nullification after a Secretary changed course.
Though Autopen use for routine matters is common, the issue arises when it’s used for significant decisions. Even without direct experience in the Office of the Secretary of Defense or the White House, it’s known that important actions require the President’s personal signature. President Trump has showcased his “wet signature” repeatedly since January 20, 2025.
Retired Special Forces Colonel and former Military Assistant Professor Steve Bucci, who has witnessed the inner workings of the Defense Department, shared his insights on this scandal:
“I think they will say they followed the policy pre-approved by the President. That is frankly nonsense. It is never supposed to be used to circumvent the decision-making process. The Autopen is for routine actions, like signing photos and standard boilerplate response to letter type documents. Policy, pardons, executive orders, honest to goodness decision documents are supposed to be read, approved, and signed by the principal, not Autopenned by a staffer. The biggest crisis we had was when (someone) decided to Autopen condolence letters. When the Boss found out, he went nuts. That never happened again. We never used Autopen for anything operational such as Deployment Orders. This (the Biden Autopen scandal) is Woodrow Wilson level fraud.”
The Biden Committee’s actions, including pardons, should be declared null and void. Autopen-Gate is a grave Constitutional matter that may ultimately require the Supreme Court’s intervention. Never before has a Committee managed the Presidency under such fraudulent conditions.
Those who benefited from these actions, including Kinzinger, Cheney, Hunter, Fauci, and others, should prepare themselves legally. This issue isn’t going anywhere.
