Image by Colin Lloyd from Unsplash Democrats are throwing the kitchen sink at Donald Trump to derail his project.
They’re willing to shred the Constitution to keep him from returning to the White House.
And a law teacher closed down this Democrat witch hunt versus Donald Trump.
United States District Judge Tanya Chutkan, an Obama appointee, is attempting to silence former President Donald Trump on the campaign trail.
She issued a restricted gag order in Trump’s case involving January 6 to bar the former President from publicly commenting on Unique Counsel Jack Smith’s office, possible witnesses, and court staff.
Smith’s workplace was pushing for the gag order claiming that Trump’s talk about his Fact Social platform were prompting violence and tainting the possible jury pool for the case.
The gag order would silence Trump from talking about the January sixth while he’s campaigning for President.
The legal witch hunts against him have actually ended up being inseparable from his project.
A Washington, D.C. federal appeals court momentarily lifted the gag order but a legal fight is still brewing over it.
Legal scholar states Trump’s gag order is unconstitutional
George Washington University law teacher Jonathan Turley called the gag order on Trump “unconstitutional” during an interview on Fox News after the appeals court actioned in.
“They might have left it to continue, to continue while they examined it, however, they chose, maybe in an abundance of care to buy this interruption till they can give it a complete evaluation,” Turley said. “The factor I think this might be rather considerable is due to the fact that I believe the order is unconstitutional.”
Trump’s legal team is arguing the gag order is an infraction of the previous President’s First Change rights.
“I said that when it was first provided. It’s a very odd concept of order since the court here demanded having this trial before the election, sort of shoehorned it in before Super Tuesday,” Turley continued. “And everyone in this election is going to be discussing these cases, except a single person under this gag order.”
The January 6 case is scheduled to go to trial on the day before the GOP Main’s Super Tuesday when dozens of states are holding contests.
Jack Smith is arguing that the gag order is essential because any criticism of his witch hunt by Trump is undermining his case against the previous President.
“He can’t slam the prosecutors, he can’t criticize witnesses, and unique counsel Jack Smith simply asked for this order to be expanded in a similarly unconstitutional method,” Turley said. “That has actually drawn the criticism even of the ACLU, which is a strong critic of Donald Trump, however the ACLU has stated look, this is flagrantly unconstitutional.”
The gag order is so blatantly unconstitutional that the far-left ACLU, which took legal action against the Trump administration over 200 times, is opposing it.
The criminal cases versus Trump have ended up being an essential part of the presidential project so the gag order is keeping the former President from safeguarding himself in the court of popular opinion.
“Much of this election is going to switch on these prosecutions. Countless individuals believe that the criminal justice system has been weaponized,” Turley described. “Now, whether that holds true or not, when you hold these trials before the election, everyone is going to be speaking about it, and there is going to be sharp criticism.”
Plainly, Judge Tanya Chutkan is attempting to boost Democrats’ chances in the 2024 Election by trying to muzzle Donald Trump.